User talk:BRINGit34/Space Law - Revision history

imported>BRINGit34: Removed Discussion thingy's. Don't know why I made it

2024-09-10T13:58:57Z

Removed Discussion thingy's. Don't know why I made it

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 10 September 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Is Docking and Visitors needed? ==~~

	~~'''I say yes!'''~~

	~~I think that having a system for visitors is a good idea.~~

	To my knowledge SS14 is really the first to even need it, I don't remember any sort of scenario in SS13 where it was required. So we are sort of in an area where it stills need to be tested. But as I see it it was unused before because of the lack of visitors and now that they are a common part of a shift there is a need for a space law entry.

	~~This would help reduce bad behavior towards syndicate refugees, as well as clearing any misconceptions as to who counts as a foreign invader.~~

	~~== Skeletons in the eye of the law ==~~

	~~I understand that many see skeletons as only having rights to space law if they are accepted as part of the crew.~~

	~~I.E: Given an ID card and Job aboard the station.~~

	~~I disagree with this assessment and think that skeletons should always fall under space law.~~

	Skeletons as they exist are visitors/passengers. They emerge on the ship and have always been on the ship. They are neutral entities and as thus can can engage in antagonistic/non-antagonistic behavior. And will be punished by space law

	The only justification I have seen that refutes this statement is that Admins disagree with this assessment. As seen here https://discord.com/channels/310555209753690112/1125299494066597888/1248723095968026647

	~~In my interpretation of my own space law skeletons are protected as passengers/visitors.~~

	~~== Mitigating Circumstances? Should this be included? ==~~



	* Certain actions reduce the time of sentences

	* Most SS13 servers have some form of this in their space law. Goon and TG both do it to differing extents.

	* This would also provide much more incentive for lessened sentences. I feel that a common issue is Warden's issue max punishment 9 times out of 10 and this could help reduce that.

	~~=== Mitigating Circumstances & Special Circumstances ===~~

	~~{\| class="wikitable"~~
	\|-
	~~! [[#FirstDegree\|1-XX - Mitigating Circumstance]]!! Code~~
	\|-
	~~\| [[#Self Defense\|Self Defense]] \|\| 00~~
	\|-
	~~\| [[#Cooperation\|Cooperation]] \|\| 01~~
	\|-
	\|}

	~~This is very WIP as I kinda sort of thought of it recently so expect a lot of changes to this.~~

imported>BRINGit34: /* Mitigating Circumstances? Should this be included? */ new section

2024-07-07T20:43:59Z

Mitigating Circumstances? Should this be included?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 7 July 2024
Line 22:		Line 22:

	In my interpretation of my own space law skeletons are protected as passengers/visitors.		In my interpretation of my own space law skeletons are protected as passengers/visitors.

			== Mitigating Circumstances? Should this be included? ==



			* Certain actions reduce the time of sentences

			* Most SS13 servers have some form of this in their space law. Goon and TG both do it to differing extents.

			* This would also provide much more incentive for lessened sentences. I feel that a common issue is Warden's issue max punishment 9 times out of 10 and this could help reduce that.

			=== Mitigating Circumstances & Special Circumstances ===

			{\| class="wikitable"
			\|-
			! [[#FirstDegree\|1-XX - Mitigating Circumstance]]!! Code
			\|-
			\| [[#Self Defense\|Self Defense]] \|\| 00
			\|-
			\| [[#Cooperation\|Cooperation]] \|\| 01
			\|-
			\|}

			This is very WIP as I kinda sort of thought of it recently so expect a lot of changes to this.

imported>BRINGit34: /* Skeletons in the eye of the law */ new section

2024-07-07T19:31:12Z

Skeletons in the eye of the law: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 7 July 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This would help reduce bad behavior towards syndicate refugees, as well as clearing any misconceptions as to who counts as a foreign invader.		This would help reduce bad behavior towards syndicate refugees, as well as clearing any misconceptions as to who counts as a foreign invader.

			== Skeletons in the eye of the law ==

			I understand that many see skeletons as only having rights to space law if they are accepted as part of the crew.

			I.E: Given an ID card and Job aboard the station.

			I disagree with this assessment and think that skeletons should always fall under space law.

			Skeletons as they exist are visitors/passengers. They emerge on the ship and have always been on the ship. They are neutral entities and as thus can can engage in antagonistic/non-antagonistic behavior. And will be punished by space law

			The only justification I have seen that refutes this statement is that Admins disagree with this assessment. As seen here https://discord.com/channels/310555209753690112/1125299494066597888/1248723095968026647

			In my interpretation of my own space law skeletons are protected as passengers/visitors.

imported>BRINGit34: /* Is Docking and Visitors needed? */ new section

2024-07-07T19:13:54Z

Is Docking and Visitors needed?: new section

New page

== Is Docking and Visitors needed? ==

'''I say yes!'''

I think that having a system for visitors is a good idea.

To my knowledge SS14 is really the first to even need it, I don't remember any sort of scenario in SS13 where it was required. So we are sort of in an area where it stills need to be tested. But as I see it it was unused before because of the lack of visitors and now that they are a common part of a shift there is a need for a space law entry.

This would help reduce bad behavior towards syndicate refugees, as well as clearing any misconceptions as to who counts as a foreign invader.